Last month IBM announced its decision to junk Apache Harmony, an open-source Java implementation of Java, and join Oracle's OpenJDK project. In effect, Oracle has recognised it needs Apple -. Oracle and Apple have announced the OpenJDK project for Mac OS X. Volume can be attached to a machine; and how a machine can connect to a network. “Bringing together the complementary technologies and products from.

1. Oracle Apple Join Hands In Openjdk Project For Mac Free
2. Oracle Apple Join Hands In Openjdk Project For Mac
3. Oracle Apple Join Hands In Openjdk Project For Mac 10

Hello Jeremy, welcome to the project and thank you for the contribution! It is great that you are Mac developer. We still had no reports of working build on Mac OS X until now.:) Another cool thing in your commits are the setup and build instructions and instructions how to run it from IDE. I have some questions about some changes, I will comment it to the corresponding changes in the pull request. For access to development mailing list please request it in a comment on.

Tex or Doug will give you access there. Have a nice day and welcome to the team! Hello Jeremy, it seems that Java 7 from Sun is only 64 bit on the download page. So if all Macs are now 64 bit and only Oracle official Java is 64 bit, maybe we include your patch and support 64 bit only (at least for now). I am reconsidering merging now because it would be nice to have open source release for all platforms in reasonable time for community.

It could motivate people and bring more developers to project. As you are Mac user, could you please help me clarify some questions?

There does not seem to be Java 6 package for Mac from Oracle. So the Java 6 on Mac is from Apple, right? How about the Java 7 - are the Macs shipped with it?

It is official Oracle distribution or Apple one? Could all Mac OS systems be updated to Java 7? I hope I haven't asked too much questions.:). Hello, Questions are never any trouble at all:) Please ask away. Yeah, the way it works is that Apple maintains Java 6 for OSX, and Oracle maintains Java 7 and higher. New macs aren't shipped with any Java, so people would need to download it from Oracle. I don't know how many people would still have a 32-bit Java on their Mac, if that would be worth maintaining a separate binary or build flags.

That's why I went with 64-bit in my initial patch. If you'd like to merge these commits as-is, let me know; if you want me to do anything else, I can find some time this weekend.

Thanks, -Jeremy. Thank you for answer, Jeremy. If you would be able to make also 32 bit support, it would be great. I will still merge your commit into master branch (possibly tomorrow) and the 32 bit support can be added later. Still have some questions at hand:) How is the installer for Mac generated - is it dmg or archive or something else? Is Install4J needed to build it? If you can think of anything that could be Mac version missing or could be improved, let me please know.

We can also communicate via e-mail. My address is pavel (then add a dot) benak (then ampersand) gmail (the dot again) com (This is as a spam protection;) ). Hello, that looks great; thanks! I was able to build and run it from your master branch. I haven't looked into the installer for Mac yet, there hasn't been time, so I've been running it under Eclipse.

Oracle Apple Join Hands In Openjdk Project For Mac Free

Later this week I'll have time to look into things more. I'll want to clarify the install docs. (For instance, the expected error on first run during project setup is 'Couldn't link with native library: 'DCRaw' ' which looks alarming if you're not expecting it.). Some of the windows have bad color contrast on mac (light-gray text on light background).

Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.

Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.

Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.

Is a reddit for discussion and news about Guidelines. Please keep submissions on topic and of high quality. Just because it has a computer in it doesn't make it programming. If there is no code in your link, it probably doesn't belong here. Direct links to app demos (unrelated to programming) will be removed.

No surveys. Please follow proper. Info. Do you have a question?. Do you have something funny to share with fellow programmers? Please take it to.

For posting job listings, please visit. Check out our. It could use some updating. Are you interested in promoting your own content? Related reddits. I'm glad there's a concerted effort to keep Java around. Java, in my opinion, is a fantastic language, and a fantastic concept.

Unfortunately for mankind, it also is under the thumb of Oracle. Oracle's lawyers are going to litigate Java into obscurity, and it really sucks because Java as a language is fantastic and very easy to get into.

It doesn't quite have the idiosyncrasies that Python has, which makes it fundamentally more sound. Also, the JavaDoc system is hands down one of the best inventions for a modern programming language - it really does force you take the time and document everything which is highly underrated. As is, if I want to learn something in Python, I really only have code examples. While those are neat and useful, at the end of the day I'd really rather just have a giant list of all available methods and object types with documentation there.

I really hope they succeed. Java is a great language that should thrive on its technical merits, but I just wish Oracle had never been in the picture. Unfortunately for mankind, it also is under the thumb of Oracle. Fortunately for mankind, though, that thumb also belongs to the hand that gives out the hundreds of millions of dollars necessary to develop OpenJDK - and has now contributed all the remaining closed-source parts of Sun's and BEA's JDKs - a project that companies like Apple, Google, Amazon, Twitter, Netflix, and many, many others rely so heavily on yet don't wish to contribute the funds necessary to support. (I work at Oracle on OpenJDK, but speak only on behalf of myself). I'm grateful for your work, and the community should be as well.

However, Oracle definitely has not treated the Java community very well historically, and that continues to today. It's becoming more and more obvious they want a cut of all profits made from Java, which is a questionable end-goal at best. The more they try to tighten the screws, the more people they're going to lose to competing languages that don't have as great of a profit motive. Short term gains above long-term at all costs, or something like that. Oracle definitely has not treated the Java community very well historically, and that continues to today. It's becoming more and more obvious they want a cut of all profits made from Java, which is a questionable end-goal at best. How is it becoming apparent?

(Also, 'all the profits'??? You do realize that language/runtime development is not much of a money-making undertaking for any company these days.) they try to tighten the screws How are the screws tightened? By finally completing the transition, just a few days ago, to a fully open-sourced Java?. You know, that small lawsuit against Google.for example.

How is it becoming apparent and how are the screws tightened? By completing the transition to a fully open-sourced Java?, which heavily implied that Oracle is going to drop support for OpenJDK in favor of steering as many people away from it as possible (which they are doing right now). In addition to that, it's heavily implied that if you do anything with Java that isn't a personal hobby, you need to purchase a Java SE license, which is the tightening of the screws that I mentioned. Don't get me wrong. I think that this move is a good one for the community, but I do worry about what Oracle will do long-term. They've already gone after big-name companies, so who's going to stop them when they go after the smaller companies?

(Of course, this is assuming they can set some kind of precedence that is favorable to them). You know, that small lawsuit against Google.for example. It's a large lawsuit, but how has it affected the Java community in any way?

Which heavily implied that Oracle is going to drop support for OpenJDK in favor of steering as many people away from it as possible (which they are doing right now). The exact opposite! We've fully open-sourced Oracle JDK - - and are actively encouraging people to use it by which we tout at every conference. That announcement just says that Oracle will no longer freely support a 5-year-old version of Java; does that seem unfair to you? Would you rather Oracle committed resources to updating 5-year-old versions instead of developing new GCs, compilers and language features? In addition to that, it's heavily implied that if you do anything with Java that isn't a personal hobby, you need to purchase a Java SE license, which is the tightening of the screws that I mentioned. I have no idea where you're getting this, but by fully open sourcing all the remaining bits of Oracle JDK, and by publishing binaries, and by making numerous public statements, we have both implied and explicitly stated the exact opposite.

The situation is simple: For the first time, Java is now fully open source and you can download it for Windows, Mac and Linux, or, if you prefer, from other sources offering OpenJDK builds. Similarly, if you want support, you can purchase it from Oracle, or, if you prefer, from other vendors that offer it. It's a large lawsuit, but how has it affected the Java community in any way? I can't believe you're asking this question in good faith. Google was (and is) an extremely significant member of the Java community.

Google was the one company that actually made Java relevant on mobile. In return, Oracle showed their appreciation with an $8.8billion lawsuit. So I'm surprised that you have to ask how this could have anything other than a chilling effect on the java community at-large. 'Please adopt this open source language - except don't treat it like an open source language and for god's sake please don't advance our goal of making Java more popular or we will sue you into the ground.' . Oracle wanted their cake, and they wanted to eat it, too. They tried to push Java as this cool open language that anyone can use for free.

And then once it had a really wide adoption, they suddenly flipped a switch and tried to charge more and more money. All of this was a possibility because of the licensing. Java (Oracle's Java, not Java as a language) was not licensed with something like GPL, so they had every right to do what they did. But, in the end, all they did was sue Google and then saw their entire market share take a nosedive. No major company is going to want to pick up Java if they know they're going to open themselves to a lawsuit, and the upper ups don't know the difference between Oracle Java and OpenJDK. Thus, all we've seen is a huge chilling effect. They're not going to pick up any new major customers, so they're just going to have to double down on their existing customers.

Which is also why they're giving up on trying to go after the small fish - they failed to get a favorable precedence, so they're just going to scrap their plans and go after Enterprise customers who have the money to just pay them and get them to leave them alone. They're literally becoming a patent troll, and it's sad. So I'm surprised that you have to ask how this could have anything other than a chilling effect on the java community at-large. As an Oracle employee, I don't think I can discuss the merits of the case (which, BTW, Sun had reportedly wanted to pursue but didn't have the resources for), but they are irrelevant to the matter of effect on the community. The lawsuit has hardly affected Java developers inside Google, who throughout this whole thing continued to run their massive codebase on OpenJDK, participated and gave talks at Oracle conferences, and even forked OpenJDK and occasionally contributed back to the mainline.

Fn+Delete remains backspace, and Fn + top-right key remains delete. • Enable/disable downstream USB ports on USB models. Features by Model Model Name Model # Color Switch Type Interface Blank Keytops Introduced Other Features Happy Hacking Keyboard PD-KB02 White Membrane,, No Dec 20, 1996 Dec 10, 2006 Buzzer (Sun), Power supply switch (Sun/Mac) PD-KB02N Happy Hacking Keyboard Lite PD-KB100W White PS/2 Jun 7, 1999 Unknown Was also available in black and white non-labeled versions Happy Hacking Keyboard Lite 2 PD-KB200W/P White Mar 15, 2001 Dec 19, 2008 Arrow keys, 2-port USB hub. • Swap the alt. Pfu pd-kb220ma happy hacking keyboard lite2.

Google relies on and benefits tremendously from OpenJDK, so let's not pretend either side here is a saintly selfless actor deserving adoring appreciation or that anyone was doing anyone any favors here. If Java use inside Google was hardly affected, I can't see how the lawsuit possibly had anything at all to do with you. It was (or is) a business matter between two mega-corporations, both of which are beholden to little more than profit and the interests of their shareholders. I know that some members of the Java community were on Google's side while others were on Oracle's side (and most were indifferent), but other than the sports aspect, I don't think anyone can point to any real effect on the Java community. Unless you're a Google or an Oracle executive, I don't see how you can, in good faith, argue that the lawsuit had any such effect at all. I would assume that the vast majority of members of the 10-million-strong Java community have hardly even heard of it, let alone noticed there was a lawsuit at all. Please adopt this open source language - except don't treat it like an open source language The lawsuit was about a Google project which very intentionally was not based on OpenJDK and chose not to use Java's open source license, so I don't see what it had to do with open source (I believe now things have changed and Android does use parts of OpenJDK).

OpenJDK is 100% open source by every measure - just like Linux. And just like Linux or any other open source software, it's open source status is defined and protected by its open source license, which you have to abide. The Java specification (including the automated conformance tests) is not open source, nor has it ever been claimed to be; why? Because it is not released under an open source license.

And for god's sake please don't advance our goal of making Java more popular or we will sue you into the ground Seriously? Do you honestly think that Google's intent, or the reason it was sued, was because they wanted to advance the goal of making Java more popular? Even Google executives don't claim that, and I don't think you're making any kind of good-faith argument here. But regardless, the lawsuit still had nothing to do with the open-sourcedness of Java (which, again, Google chose not to rely on), nor had any real effect on the community. 480 word diatribe discussing the merits of the case I did no such thing.

Oracle Apple Join Hands In Openjdk Project For Mac

All I did was point out that the case had little effect on Java developers inside Google, let alone on others. Precisely because I may be biased, I did not voice any opinion whatsoever on the subject of the case, which was the use of the Java specification. I also pointed out the simple fact that OpenJDK was not the subject of the case. I am legit wondering if you are, in fact, Larry Ellison Shoot, you got me! Your arguments are very well made, you've shown astute observation, good counting skills, and a good understanding of what 'merits of a case' mean (a member of Google's legal team?).

How are the screws tightened? By finally completing the transition, just a few days ago, to a fully open-sourced Java?

Oracle Apple Join Hands In Openjdk Project For Mac 10

This really grinds my gears. Oracle has completely open sourced java. Not just essential libraries, or the runtime. Javafx is opensource and cross platform. Jfr is now an even more advanced opensource profiler than visualvm, the other open source java profiler was. The whole damn java platform from oracle has been made open. And people still pretend that oracle is doing nothing good at all for java.

They ignore that under sun, java languished at 6 for a loooong long time meanwhile, MS opensources some fragments of.net, and everyone has nothing but praise for them. As someone that's been using a JVM language for a long time, the rate java has been improving under oracle has picked up more and more.

Things that seemed out of reach and impossible years ago like lambdas and modules have been implemented. Things that seemed like a pipedream for java years ago like type inference or pattern matching have been implemented or are on the way.

Better native interop is coming down the pipeline, with talks being given on SIMD access from within java through the vector api. Green threads (fibers) are coming to the jvm, value types are coming, and new low latency GCs are being introduced. Java is doing super well under oracle's stewardship so far, and right now, i'm excited for its future.